Shockwave!! The Clintons Owned the DNC in 2015-2016!

article-author
LightWorker111

Author Bio.

The imminent release of former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile’s new book, Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House, is creating quite a buzz on the Hill and down on Conspiracy Street.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Sneak previews published earlier this week reveal that the Clinton campaign entered into an agreement, before the nomination, to control daily operations of the 2016 Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) is joining the growing movement of people from all political parties to hold Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff accountable for illegally influencing the spring 2016 presidential election primaries in order to rig the nomination pro-Hillary – by paying all the impoverished organization’s bills.

This adds new meaning to the popular expression, “I own you!”

Now, most people would not think of “broke” and “National Democratic Committee” in the same sentence. But Gary Gensler, CFO of the Hillary campaign, told Brazile in a phone call after the July 2016 Democratic convention that the DNC had debt totaling $2 MILLION! How could such a big, powerful, influential outfit like that run out of money?

For one thing, the DNC needs $3.5-$4 million a MONTH to operate, Gensler said.

According to Brazile, her predecessor as DNC Committee Chair, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was not an active fundraiser. This was indeed unfortunate because President Barack Obama had put his dearly beloved party in debt. $24 million in debt, to be exact. What, no pay-backs, Barry? Where’s your gratitude, dude?

The Obama campaign promised to pay back their 2012 debt to the DNC in 2016. Give the millionaire’s election team credit for trying, but they returned only $12.5 million to the DNC.

Enter the Hillary for America campaign and its companion Hillary Victory Fund. These two organizations collected hundreds of thousands of dollars above the $2,700 maximum contribution limit imposed on individual supporters. Deposits were made at the state level before funds transferred to DNC headquarters in Brooklyn, NY.

This Democratic campaign contribution money was supposed to go to the ultimate winner of the Democratic nomination. That person might have been the very popular Bernie Sanders. But with the Hillary Victory Fund working against him and all other Democratic hopefuls nationwide, is it any wonder that Sanders bowed out of the race and endorsed his rival Mrs. Clinton in mid-July 2016?

Plain and simple, illegal use of campaign contributions is how the DNC ponied up $10 million to pay off the rest of Obama’s campaign expenses in order to run the Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign. Otherwise, the Democratic Party would have collapsed financially. Perhaps that would not have been such a bad thing?

The Clintons may not have held legal title to the Democratic National Committee, but covering all its operational expenses makes them the de facto owners. Bernie Sanders didn’t stand a chance with Hillary holding the purse-strings behind the presidential nomination process.

In August 2015 – before Hillary won the nomination – the Clinton contingent had control over staffing and strategy decisions.

We know this because Donna Brazile’s book spells it all out. Her investigation began with a promise to Bernie Sanders: to find out if the incriminatory emails, stolen and posted online by Russian hackers, which alleged that the Clintons were buying the 2016 nomination and election were true.

Once leading the DNC, Brazile asked for and got the proof she needed. The Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America was crystal clear. In Brazile’s words:

“The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and [campaign manager] Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias [a campaign lawyer]—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.”

Speaking plain English, the 2016 Democratic election nomination was rigged by the candidate who ended up winning the party nomination for the highest elected position in the nation, Commander in Chief of the military.

Consider what might have happened to the impoverished DNC if the kind-spirited, selfless Clintons hadn’t stepped in to save their grits (to sling another down-home-ism). Would it really have wound down and fallen off the board like any other corporation?

Why, the national Democratic Party might have had to have a bake sale!

Lucky for all those Dems – except Bernie Sanders supporters, of course – Uncle Bill and Aunt Hillary were close at hand to pitch right in with sizeable donations to keep the machine grinding toward what they expected would be ultimate victory for the Divine Ms. H.

History, of course, tells another story.

Still, the fact that the Democratic Presidential candidate (Mrs. Clinton) was co-funding the organization established to get her elected raises some serious ethical and legal questions.


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Perhaps, at last, Mrs. Clinton will be investigated completely and transparently. Is it too much to hope that consequences suitable to her illegal, anti-American – dare we say TRAITOROUS activities? – be handed down by the highest courts of the land?

Stop the Clinton conspirators now!


7 Comments
  1. Post Author

    Bedfellows make for strange Politics. Other than with money, how owuld the DNC have put on any campaign? But, I digress.
    Hellary adn bill may be no better that Donald rump when it comes to ethics and honesty, but the outcome did NOT make Hillary President Hillary

    Dona Brazile has been in the trenches for decades and is a worthy protagonist in the revelations she is making. It only proves that the Presidency goes to the highest bidder. The Pre-election campaign claim by true was the election was rigged. He just happened, along with ‘Vice President Putin’, to be the better “rigger”. I do agree however, that these facts ned to be known and the political processed returned to some honesty and at least:
    Of the people, for the people by the people of the USA

  2. Post Author

    U.S. «democracy» has been rigged by the money owners everywhere. If you try to do the same serious investigation in the GOP side the result would be utterly grotesque.

    • Post Author

      When you get caught red handed, Deflect and change the subject. An old liberal trick.

  3. Post Author

    To the victors go the spoils. Of course if they paid the bills, they get influence. Bernis, a socialist not a democrat, who believes all moneys should be shared, demands a big share of money belonging to a party that isn’t his, that he has never been a part ofas he and hia misogynistic bots elbow in at the last minute. I always knew DB was no Clinton fan and now she hopes to sell books and hitch her wagon to Bernie’s fading star. Moderation is what we need not extremism. These guys may destroy the party, and, at this point, who cares!?

  4. Post Author

    Your article now brings to mind a word from God, as reported by an Australian lady named Lana Vawser: report dated April 24, 2017 — I just re-viewed her words. She said, that the Lord told her, that He is “uprooting and exposing the weeds”. The Brazile book, it now seems, could be a part of the “uprooting and exposing”….

  5. Post Author

    Where does George Soros figure into this picture. Wasn’t he financing Hillary and/or the party?

  6. Post Author

    There was not and is not anyone on the GOP side that could or can compare to the crookedness of the Obama’s or Clintons.

Leave a Reply