One of the perplexing aspects about the 9/11/01 attacks in the United States concerns the official story that the Pentagon was targeted by “terrorists,” and struck by a commercial jet American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757. We know it was AA Flight 77 because of this convenient piece of “wreckage” recovered at the site:
One of our sources sent over a video, purportedly from a Pentagon security camera facing the impact site. The frame paused at 5 seconds appears to show a fast-moving projectile slamming into one side of the Pentagon from the right. This object has no wings whatsoever. The logical conclusion is that the object is a missile.
After the impact, a fireball quickly becomes thick, gray smoke. At 1:49 the video cuts to some live-action footage of the Pentagon. This footage was shot from a position opposite from the first film, but still facing the point of impact.
However, the first people on the scene who weren’t first responders (police, firefighters, medics) found no evidence that a plane actually struck the Pentagon. The wreckage did not make “forensic sense,” and raised questions immediately from objective witnesses.
The female CNN reporter begins this video by saying that a certain “Bob Franken and an eyewitness” had concluded that the plane landed “short of the Pentagon” – meaning it never made it that far.
The entire CNN breaking news segment, which includes the above video content, is shown in another YouTube video. CNN’s military affairs correspondent Jaime McIntyre said no plane even fell short of the mark. After walking up to the smoldering Pentagon, he observed:
“From my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon…The only pieces left…are small enough to pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage – nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.”
The demolished Pentagon floors didn’t collapse until 45 minutes after impact, and the burn marks were inconsistent with those seen at the WTC Twin Towers in NYC – also allegedly toppled by mere airplanes.
By the way, in terms of construction physics, the heat generated by the amount of jet fuel on a plane (based on fuel tank capacity, rate of consumption, and time from take-off) is not hot enough to “melt steel,” as the mainstream media repeated ad nauseum.
The damage seen at the Pentagon crash site is more consistent with that of a plane crash – but was there even a plane? Many investigators say the answer is no.
This video analyzes the damage done to the Pentagon. The affected area measured about 65 feet wide and 73 feet tall – the height of the building. The narrator informs:
“From wingtip to wingtip, a 757 is 124 feet, 10 inches. From nose to tail a 757 is 155 feet 3 inches in length, and the height is 44 feet 6 inches. How does a plane of those dimensions [size] fit into a hole only 65 feet across?”
Just to recap, we have first-hand reports that no significant plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon explosion site and the hole was too small to have been made by a 757 jet airplane. Both reports were buried while the mainstream media continued to bleat the cover story in order to launch the unending “War on Terror” under which we are currently oppressed.
Is there more evidence to weigh?
Try this on for size. This video reported that NO ONE DIED right after this alleged jet crashed into a busy office building during working hours. Just how is that supposed to happen, given the physical forces involved? Were the people shown being transported on stretchers actually paid, professional crisis actors?
Apparently, Bush, Cheney, and the other NWO leaders in charge of the US believed – and still believe – that We the People are dumb as stumps. We swallowed their incredibly evil lies and let them take away our civil rights under the oxymoronic Patriot Act.
Most people – or “sheeple” – who are either too busy or just not interested do believe that giving up our cherished freedoms is “the price we must pay” to ensure “national security.”
What a steaming load of horse hockey.
Occasionally, though, someone important admits the truth.
In this short video snippet from an interview with Neil Degrasse Tyson, former President Bill Clinton mentions the “Pentagon bomb.” Although lifted from its original context, Clinton seems to be answering a question about 9/11 being an inside job that was discussed by the US presidential candidates during the debates – before anything happened on 9/11.
A slip of the tongue? A guilty conscience? A mistake made while tired? You decide.
Now, consider this eye-witness testimony. A woman alleging to be a Pentagon employee inside the building during the explosion on 9/11 made this video. At 2:19, she says:
“As I was coming out of the Pentagon I didn’t see any evidence of metal, airplane seats, luggage – nothing that would give me any indication that it was a plane that had hit the building.” No one she encountered had any jet fuel on their bodies, and no one in her area.
This concerned citizen’s call to action is to open a federal grand jury to decide if We the People are the victims of highest-level perjury and obstruction of justice.
The “official story” is BUNK, plain and simple. Stop the fictional “War on Terror” forced on a nation still reeling from shock. Dismantle the pork-belly, boondoggle organizations thereby created, notably DHS and TSA.
Refocus the national narrative on the truth, and for pete’s sake, stop patronizing us.
We taxpayers funded the ridiculous “9/11 Commission Report” which concluded that the guilty party was – are you ready for this? – the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Even 9/11 Commissioner Tim Roemer spilled the beans when he told CNN, thinking back about the Pentagon attack:
“You were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night, seeing one of our fortresses pried open by a missile – uh, airplane.”
Haven’t you had enough lies?