Branded by Rachel Brand

article-author
LightWorker111

Author Bio.

A top Department of Justice (DOJ) official has announced her summary retirement from federal office. Lisa L. Brand announced on February 9, 2018, that she is stepping down as Assistant Attorney General.


The first woman ever to hold this office was confirmed by the US Senate on July 28, 2005, in George W. Bush’s Office of Legal Policy.

As third from the top over at the DOJ, Brand reports to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions, the Attorney General.

 
Robert F. Kennedy Main Justice Department Building

Along with managing the development of various civil and criminal policy initiatives, the creation of departmental regulations, and the Department’s role in the confirmation of the President’s judicial nominees, Brand has been a team player on the unwinnable “war on terror” – almost since its inception.

The Whitehouse Archives inform us:

“From July 27, 2003, until her appointment as the Assistant Attorney General, Brand served as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Policy and focused particularly on issues related to the war on terrorism.”

MSN News adds:

“Ms. Brand now oversees a wide swath of the Justice Department, including the civil division, the civil rights division and the antitrust division. She helped lead the department’s effort to extend a law that authorizes the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance program.”

NSA warrantless surveillance program?? That hot topic was mentioned in the FISA MEMO, as you may recall. Brand defends violating the Constitution, citing “national security” and “police protection.”

The problem is that warrantless surveillance of US citizens is ILLEGAL. Never mind that, according to the post-9/11 intelligence community. These tyrants’ version of Lady Justice is blind to their own transgressions, not inequality under the law.

Not everyone, however, approves of NSA spying. A CNN article explains:

“While the [FISA] law targets non-US citizens, critics warn the government may incidentally monitor US citizens who are communicating with non-US citizens outside the United States.”

The word “incidentally” here means, in the legal sense, “we couldn’t help but incriminate you when we spied on your associate.”

Brand has been busy using her keen intellect and Harvard law degree to erode American civil rights. And Democratic Americans have been loving it.

Why? Because decades of “dumbing down” in US schools in tandem with constant exposure to inane trivia (from social media to reality TV shows), all accompanied by an unending chorus of Democratic socialist rhetoric, has reduced many younger Americans from informed, rational thinkers to ignorant, leftist tools. (If you think this is an exaggeration, watch this shocking and appalling video titled “Politically-Challenged: George Mason University.”)

Our elected representatives love unconstitutional warrantless searches so much that Congress defeated a filibuster of the bill and voted (65-34) last month to extend Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act for another six years.


The NSA admits to the illegal collection and retention of all US communications

In December 2017, Brand herself told radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt on MSNBC:

“What I hear the most often is that folks want terrorists outside the U.S. to be surveilled, but they don’t want Americans to be surveilled. And I agree with that. Where the rubber hits the road on Section 702 is that if a terrorist in Afghanistan emailed me, that email to me would be collected. So I’m a U.S. person. My email, that one email is then collected. And so people want to know how are we dealing with that. And the way we deal with that is with all kinds of protections that attach once a U.S. person’s email is collected.”

It would be very interesting to know just what are these “all kinds of protections?” Once again, Americans are willingly giving up civil liberties for the sake of “national security” and to fight the fabricated “war on terror.”

What is truly terrifying is the absolute erosion of the United States Constitution since the false flag attacks on 9/11/01.

Brand also believes that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden was one of the bad guys. To jog your memory, Snowden was the conscientious federal ex-employee who gave up everything and fled the country after proving that the NSA has been collecting all our personal communications for decades – all illegally. But according to the soon-to-be-former-Assistant Attorney General:

“Snowden is a significant concern, and the intelligence agencies are working very hard to make sure that doesn’t happen again.”

Yes, our NSA handlers must make sure that no more Big Truths like that get out to Us the People.

Finally, regarding temporary extensions of FISA Section 702, Brand’s position is, “We’d like a permanent reauthorization.”

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

To her credit, Brand has done some good work supporting victims protected by the Fair Housing Act of sexual harassment from landlords, housing supervisors, and real estate agents. She also led a summit meeting on human trafficking at the DOJ only last week.

You don’t suppose that, in a supremely ironic twist, Brand is involved in Pizzagate and wants to privatize her career before the dominoes fall?

Remember, too, that the DOJ also includes the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Both agencies have been linked to the various nefarious plots and cover-ups having to do with Democrat-sponsored investigations into President Trump.

   

 

Whatever her reasons are for ditching the DOJ, the enterprising Brand has already lined up her next gig: Walmart’s top legal position, that of global governance director. Retail giant Walmart is, of course, the subject of several disturbing conspiracy theories connecting the company to FEMA camps, ostensibly for disaster response, but actually to confine militants and political dissidents if civil unrest breaks out.

True to her name, Brand has left her mark on the American justice system. Let’s hope that the next US Assistant Attorney General upholds the constitutional values and rights to privacy which the current #3 at the Justice Department abandoned a long time ago.


10 Comments
  1. Post Author

    Just what in the hell is a “U.S. person???” She says she’s a “U.S. person.” Is a “U.S. person” a citizen? She’s obviously a citizen, but it still makes me scratch my head. Shades of George Orwell! I don’t give a tinker’s damn about whatever “good” she’s done during her career, trampling the Constitution cancels all that out in my book. And hornswoggling the American people to swallow all this “national security” crap in order for us to roll over and give up our liberty classifies her as a traitor to this country, her fellow citizens and the oath(s) of office she’s taken over the years to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

    • Post Author

      if ever there was fake news, this article exemplifies it. i almost had to put my boots on for all the biased BS shoveled here. talk about people being ignorant, the writer ranks right at the top. i did have a good laugh. maybe the writer should try to get a job on the Comedy Channel or SNL!

    • Post Author

      A “U.S. Person” is the term for a corporate United States/Federal Government, 14th Amendment citizen, vs an American National or “Colorado National,” as I live in Colorado. The 14th Amendment created two classes of citizenship which is a fraud on all Americans in that this roped everyone into another deceptive citizenship that creates a “jurisdiction” over us by the feds, instead of all private Americans being a citizen of their own State and OUTSIDE the U.S. corporate jurisdiction (read, IRS taxes, and other alleged jurisdiction of this fed over Americans… http://foundationfortruthinlaw.org/14th-amendment-fraud.html . Read, and weep, and then get yourself out of their jurisdiction…

    • Post Author

      Well Said, Amen!

  2. Post Author

    A “us person” is a designation of a citizen of a “state” within the NWO/OWG under the UN, which Obama wants to be the supreme leader of.

  3. Post Author

    I want to see this entire story, front page, in the NY Times. On all the Liberal news networks. With special emphasis on the Paragraph starting out with “Why? Because decades of “dumbing down” “. The Liberals don’t want to believe the Democrats would actually do this; to support their Socialist agenda.

    • Post Author

      Nothing would please me more, Dear Reader! Thank you for your support.

  4. Post Author

    What’s good for the goose, should be good for the gander. For those uninformed as to that old saying, what it means is simply this: If you are going to challenge an otherwise exemplary Civil Servant of Constitutional abuse, you damn sure shouldn’t be guilty of it yourself. O forgive me, I forgot our President doesn’t read anything that doesn’t worship or praise him, so He will never see a comment written specifically for him!

  5. Post Author

    Man, just looking at that face reveals to me that she is a Leftist, Snob of a Bitch; my sister and I had always said years ago that those Walmart stores, windowless as they are and now I have gathered that there is one within 15 miles of every major city which makes me sure that they were meant to house patriots such as myself that have had enough of the Godless, Satan worshiping, power-mad NWO-elitist ghouls and realize that REVOLUTION will be the final SOLUTION; after all, it always is against TYRANNY!

  6. Post Author

    A Civil War may be inevitable at some point and the conflict will involve the Deep State vs. those who love freedom. We don’t need someone like this woman who surreptitiously takes away our rights in the name of freedom. I am
    glad that Snowden and Assange are exposing these cretins for who they really are.

Leave a Reply