user-photo
LightWorker111

Author Bio.

Global Warming is a Hoax

President Donald Trump and the State Department got a lot of flak after the Commander-in-Chief withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement in June of 2017.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

At the time, the State Department outlined the national strategy regarding the weather in a press release:

“The United States supports a balanced approach to climate policy that lowers emissions while promoting economic growth and ensuring energy security.”

Trump claimed he acted because the agreement would have eliminated jobs and undermined the oil, gas, coal, and manufacturing sectors. The total to Americans was projected to be trillions (with a ‘T’) of dollars.

Administration critics screamed that the President was being irresponsible to the New World Order by refusing to go along with other United Nations member countries who perpetuate their bad science behind climate change.

The main goal of the Paris climate agreement was “to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius (35.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius.”

Why preventing a rise in global temperatures is so gosh-awful important is generally not discussed. Coastal areas would be flooded. Big deal. Move inland. In other words, deal with local situations if and when a catastrophe occurs. But no. These climate pundits will shout louder than anyone else in the room to get their way with the world – literally.

On November 4, 2016, the Paris Agreement entered into force. Former President embraced the global climate change scam when he signed the Paris Agreement and promised that the U.S. would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 28 percent between 2005 and 2025 – to reduce our collective “carbon footprint” and cool global warming.

You want to talk about questionable science – and who doesn’t? The carbon footprint concept is essential to support the global warming hoax. A carbon footprint is defined as:

“The total amount of greenhouse gases produced to, directly and indirectly, support human activities, usually expressed in equivalent tons of carbon dioxide (CO2).”

Here is how the state is set for some really dubious global weather prognostication:

“When you drive a car, the engine burns fuel which creates a certain amount of CO2, depending on its fuel consumption and the driving distance. (CO2 is the chemical symbol for carbon dioxide). When you heat your house with oil, gas or coal, then you also generate CO2. Even if you heat your house with electricity, the generation of the electrical power may also have emitted a certain amount of CO2. When you buy food and goods, the production of the food and goods also emitted some quantities of CO2.”

People who burn a lot of petroleum products have bigger carbon footprints and that, according to the UN climate “experts,” is very, very bad indeed.

One problem with this thinking is that CO2 is involved in many earth systems. Carbon dioxide is essentially food for plants. If you want to reduce CO2 levels, plant a tree – or an orchard or a forest.

Instead, the globalists who insist they have the right to take charge of fixing the horrible state of climate we are currently experiencing – and it’s getting worse every day – are cutting down large forested tracts of land all around the world.


A report released this month confirmed what climate realists have said all along: we don’t know enough about this new science to determine if a problem even exists, much less how to fix it. Thinking otherwise is the height of human arrogance and oh-so-NWO propaganda.

Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) revealed on November 15, 2018, that “A new report calls the lie on the grand Paris climate change treaty. None of the promised cuts in CO2 emissions that 200-plus countries made will come close to preventing a climate ‘catastrophe.’ And many of the industrialized nations aren’t even living up to the promises they did make.”

The new report said that the G-20 nations had all failed to keep their pledges of lowering CO2 emissions. In fact, “None of the G-20 (emissions targets) is in line with the Paris Agreement.”

None!

Furthermore, even if the G-20 nations had achieved their stated goals for CO2 reductions, “it wouldn’t come close to preventing ‘catastrophic warming. – 2 degree Celsius.

None of the EU countries, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, or Turkey is tracking toward its 2030 target. In fact, some nations are seeing rising CO2 levels despite the Paris Agreement.

The IBD rightly points out that climate alarmists base their bad science on “100-year forecasts made by computer models that have trouble predicting what’s already happened.”

Add in the rare admission by Ralph Keeling, co-author of a study on ocean heat uptake, that his team had made a math error. It turned out that the oceans had not absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought. Oops.

Nic Lewis, an independent scientist, makes a habit of reviewing climate alarmist literature. He blogged on climate scientist Judith Curry’s website:

“Just a few hours of analysis and calculations, based only on published information, was sufficient to uncover apparently serious (but surely inadvertent) errors in the underlying calculations.”

No discussion about weather modification or climate change is complete without tossing in the HAARP variable. Even though this top-secret government high-atmospheric heating program was allegedly shut down in 2014, many analysts wonder if intense microwave bursts from huge antenna arrays are behind all manner of meteorological happenings going on around us.

The truth is that the Paris Climate Accord and all the other climate change flap are all part of the United Nation’s Agenda 2030, a blueprint for totalitarian control.

Thank you, President Trump, for withdrawing the U.S. from the deceitful globalists’ plan to force their New World Order down our throats.


27 Comments
  1. Post Author

    The New World Order is the prelude to the one world government ‘Beast’ in the book of Revelations. Irwin Baxter has a great Bible Study on the Endtime.
    Check it out and thank you Lord for President Trump.
    You have used people even not so saintworthy to accomplish your will.

  2. Post Author

    The writers degree is in what?

    • Post Author

      you don’t need a degree to write the truth moron

  3. Post Author

    Why doesn’t the world plant more trees? They need CO2 to exist and expel O2 for humans to exist.

    • Post Author

      We have and are. We regularly replant cut forest Hardwood forest in the southern hemisphere are the exception were forest are cut for pasture land. That being said little account seems to be given to the million upon millions of acres of fruit and nut orchards planted in semi arid areas where there was once no trees at all. If one could do a tree count today against pre industrial time I wonder how it would balance out. We might be surprised.

    • Post Author

      I agree heartily. This is one of the reasons we should be concerned about the destruction of the Amazon forests.

  4. Post Author

    Someone made a mistake. HAARP does not have any more to do with the weather than a bunch of amateur radio stations transmitting at the same time on 7.3Mhz, the highest frequency that HAARP transmits at is about 7.5. And, the transmissions were not bursts, they were continuous wave. Not microwave, not even close. How do I know it was not microwave energy? The size of the antennas in the array. All it took was a look at a photograph of them and I knew the frequency range without reading the description. So, the HAARP conspiracy belongs in the same round-file as reports of the Nazi Bell falling Kansas, Missouri, or wherever the hell it was supposed to be. Cool website otherwise.

    • Post Author

      Geoengineering
      HAARP
      EMF
      5G
      Smart Meters

      Have everything to do with the weather patterns.
      Try reading real USA Gov. Patents on them.
      They have engineered weather since Vietnam .

      Global Warming as the Cabal Of Despots use it is for Control and Money.

  5. Post Author

    OMG I think I love u! Finally a news outlet that reports the truth about global warming! It is a UN agenda to scare countries into falling for their savior scheme! The UN global agenda plans on taking over the world. Since the CIA discovered a money pot when they sprayed chemtrails in Vietnam, it’s been gung ho to rake in money with this plot! They are the ones who began spraying chemtrails around the world to warm up the earth. The metals in the spray (aluminum, barium, and others) trap the earth’s heat beneath its haze. It is killing this planet by preventing the plants and trees from fully utilizing photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is responsible for giving O2 back to the atmosphere. The waters are being poisoned by all the chemicals, and there are now massive die-offs of all kinds of animals. The Directed Energy Weapons are being used to create wildfires all over the world also! Shame on the NWO! There is one famous participant, ex-CIA Director John Brennan on YouTube admitting that chemtrails are real! Only he says they are being used to combat global warming! Does he think we are all as stupid as he is? When you play Satan with our ecological system, disaster is sure to follow! President Trump is right to pull us out of that stupid Paris Climate agreement! Maybe other countries will wise up and follow suit. If the companies working for the UN can’t afford to spray anymore, then the earth can return to normal!

  6. Post Author

    The whole thing is a power play. The Dictatorship of the Proletariat has got a tattered reputation after a 70 year long field test in the Soviet Union, and a 10 year or so field test in Venezuela.
    So, time to put new wine in old chalices, and now rhe Dictatorship of the Greeneteraiat is being promoted. Pure power play by the Deep States. Additionally, this (among other things) is being promoted by a coterie of Billionaires, to whom money no longer means much – once you have your first billion, additional billions have little effect on your personal life. So no they Billionaires are buying political power. The Billionaires in their BilliClub are wielding BilliClubs to get the votes, and the rest of us are being BilliClubbed by the BilliClubs.
    миллиардеры всех стран, соединяйтесь!

  7. Post Author

    I agree fully. I have NEVER bought into this hocus-pocus balderdash. Never will. Not mentioned in this well written, truthful article is that the computer models that allegedly support “CC” are programed by the beneficiaries of the whole hoax. The whole concept of “man-made climate change” thrives on “guilt”. Primarily the “guilt” that is held inside by the citizens of successful industrialized western countries that have been criticized by the governments of lesser successful countries for pirating the resources of the world. The whole phony-baloney “story” was started by people born too late to cash-in on the fossil-fuel industry so they conspire with similar bitter people and try to kill fossil-fuel consumption. They are also supported by the manufacturers of very expensive light bulbs and electric cars which themselves consume fossil fuels at their charging stations. I praise Donald Trump for his chutzpah.

  8. Post Author

    Not to damn leftists in CA.
    Yet do nothing in thier lives to reduce emissions,
    Just talk, No action.
    Still want a EV, tired of paying tune up, lube & gasoline esp in CA. Nice used Tesla would be welcome

  9. Post Author

    There is a serious error in the temperature calculation ..ie.. “global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius (35.6 degrees Fahrenheit).” On a thermometer 2 C is 35.6F , but the discussion is about increase of 2C which would be 3.6F.

    • Post Author

      Aw, you beat me to it.

  10. Post Author

    Thank you President Trump for using some good old common sense, rather than absorb the hype from the UN. (Useless Nations)

  11. Post Author

    Keep up fighting the herd. I have read “drastic measures” will be needed to stop the apocalyptic global warming. Drastic measures would mean telling you how far to drive your vehicle and/or how many vehicles you may have that are internal combustion engines and on and on

  12. Post Author

    Yes, thank you President Trump.

  13. Post Author

    Comment I wish to thank the President Donald Trump ,for his mighty great job done for the Nation.

  14. Post Author

    All good interesting stuff. I would like to add the following. For me to be told to accept that Climate Change (originally named global warming) is a result from cows and cars farting has to be a challenge to my intellect? I have not lately seen much reference to a proven natural phenomenon known as “Solar Cycles” which are simply explained as the ‘voyage’ the earth takes around the Sun is “Elliptical” not “circular.” This results in the earth sometimes travelling closer to the Sun and other times naturally travelling further away from the hot Sun. I am not sure of the time periods between phases of Solar cycles, however, i believe they are every few decades apart, even 100 years.
    Pre dinosaur times, the earth itself was covered in CO2-producing fires (volcanos, which we now see as mountains and hills). So for me be expected to believe the “farting” theory over the “Solar-Cycles explanation” as the culprit is a farce. However, I am all for cleaning the planet up, but not to use incorrect reasons to do so?

  15. Post Author

    “Coastal areas would be flooded. Big deal. Move inland. In other words, deal with local situations if and when a catastrophe occurs.”
    Are you seriously suggesting that New Orleans, Manhattan, etc. should be moved inland? And only *after* they get flooded? And what about places that have hardly any inland, like e.g. Hawaii?

    When one doesn’t know much about the climate, it’s easy to make it all sound like humbug, but the more one knows, the clearer it becomes that it isn’t.

    No science is 100 % sure about anything, that’s just the way science works. But if 4 % of climate scientists don’t agree that we’re heading towards a catastrophe, would you rather believe them than the other 96 % ? I think that’s pretty undemocratic, and in fact irresponsible towards all the future (and present) victims of floods, fires, tornadoes, and what not.

  16. Post Author

    Dear Sr. I agree that Global Warming is a Hoax. But you have to correct your text. An increase of 2°C is not 35.6 °F. Actually is just 3.6°F of increase. You have to multiply by 1.8 ! We are talking about increase and not the pure temperature.

  17. Post Author

    All warming comes from the sun apart from a little from volcanic activity
    The more CO2 the better for the greening of the planet . It is not even a greenhouse gas and at 1 molecule of CO2 per 2500 of air is negligible. It was much more in the past . It is an agenda 21 psyop.

  18. Post Author

    This article is fine for what it is, but I would like to see much more targeted articles that debunk specific aspects of the myth instead of broad generalizations. For example, the article briefly mentions CO2 but doesn’t go much into that subject. Like, in earth’s past, CO2 was thousands of times higher without generating runaway warming … or that it appears that an increase in CO2 may actually be the RESULT and not the CAUSE of warming.

  19. Post Author

    looking forward to the ice age that was stopped in 1975 by spraying Antarctica with a layer of black dust. look it up Who will the left will come an ice age. These are the same people who are telling us other wise now. This will be interesting if we are still around
    https://longreads.com/2017/04/13/in-1975-newsweek-predicted-a-new-ice-age-were-still-living-with-the-consequences/

  20. Post Author

    Fourteen U.S. agencies, representing 300 scientists, release a joint report on climate change.
    This article twice mentions ‘A report’, without citing what report. Hmm, what should I believe?

  21. Post Author

    The author of this article is certainly correct in the falsehood of climate change, but to tell people who live in coastal areas to “deal” with it by moving inland is exactly what the Globalist want. This is the reason for the “created” harsh hurricanes. They want people to move inland so they can better control them. They want to do away with the availability of people living all along our coast. Part of the Agenda 2030 plan in order to have more control over the people. If you can group together the population, you can have better control over them. There are already planned communities in many places that offer smaller apartment living where people will walk or ride bicycles to wherever they need to go. All planned to get rid of our cars! This may sound outrageous but some highways in cities are built to “create” more traffic jams to force people to use public transportation instead of cars. The object of this game is to promote the abandonment of people using their cars. They want us to walk or ride bicycles just like those in third world countries do now! The destruction of property as we have seen take place by fires and hurricanes can cause not only lose the loss of people’s homes but force many into bankruptcy and homelessness. Just another way to destroy our way of life here in the US. I would like to know just how many insurance companies will face bankruptcy after all the claims have been filed from the damage caused by all the storms and fires? Anybody have any data on that? Maybe only the smaller insurance companies will fail while the big companies will not. Just a thought.

  22. Post Author

    On January 8, I will present my climate physics paper at the annual meeting of the American Meteorological Society in Phoenix. My paper proves the UN IPCC climate theory is invalid. My paper shows how a simple physics model accurately simulates the 14C data, which the IPCC model cannot do. You can read my paper and see my poster here: https://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/agw-hypothesis/my-poster-presentation-for-the-ams-annual-meeting-jan-8-2019/

Leave a Reply