President Donald Trump and the State Department got a lot of flak after the Commander-in-Chief withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement in June of 2017.
At the time, the State Department outlined the national strategy regarding the weather in a press release:
“The United States supports a balanced approach to climate policy that lowers emissions while promoting economic growth and ensuring energy security.”
Trump claimed he acted because the agreement would have eliminated jobs and undermined the oil, gas, coal, and manufacturing sectors. The total to Americans was projected to be trillions (with a ‘T’) of dollars.
Administration critics screamed that the President was being irresponsible to the New World Order by refusing to go along with other United Nations member countries who perpetuate their bad science behind climate change.
The main goal of the Paris climate agreement was “to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius (35.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius.”
Why preventing a rise in global temperatures is so gosh-awful important is generally not discussed. Coastal areas would be flooded. Big deal. Move inland. In other words, deal with local situations if and when a catastrophe occurs. But no. These climate pundits will shout louder than anyone else in the room to get their way with the world – literally.
On November 4, 2016, the Paris Agreement entered into force. Former President embraced the global climate change scam when he signed the Paris Agreement and promised that the U.S. would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 28 percent between 2005 and 2025 – to reduce our collective “carbon footprint” and cool global warming.
You want to talk about questionable science – and who doesn’t? The carbon footprint concept is essential to support the global warming hoax. A carbon footprint is defined as:
“The total amount of greenhouse gases produced to, directly and indirectly, support human activities, usually expressed in equivalent tons of carbon dioxide (CO2).”
Here is how the state is set for some really dubious global weather prognostication:
“When you drive a car, the engine burns fuel which creates a certain amount of CO2, depending on its fuel consumption and the driving distance. (CO2 is the chemical symbol for carbon dioxide). When you heat your house with oil, gas or coal, then you also generate CO2. Even if you heat your house with electricity, the generation of the electrical power may also have emitted a certain amount of CO2. When you buy food and goods, the production of the food and goods also emitted some quantities of CO2.”
People who burn a lot of petroleum products have bigger carbon footprints and that, according to the UN climate “experts,” is very, very bad indeed.
One problem with this thinking is that CO2 is involved in many earth systems. Carbon dioxide is essentially food for plants. If you want to reduce CO2 levels, plant a tree – or an orchard or a forest.
Instead, the globalists who insist they have the right to take charge of fixing the horrible state of climate we are currently experiencing – and it’s getting worse every day – are cutting down large forested tracts of land all around the world.
A report released this month confirmed what climate realists have said all along: we don’t know enough about this new science to determine if a problem even exists, much less how to fix it. Thinking otherwise is the height of human arrogance and oh-so-NWO propaganda.
Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) revealed on November 15, 2018, that “A new report calls the lie on the grand Paris climate change treaty. None of the promised cuts in CO2 emissions that 200-plus countries made will come close to preventing a climate ‘catastrophe.’ And many of the industrialized nations aren’t even living up to the promises they did make.”
The new report said that the G-20 nations had all failed to keep their pledges of lowering CO2 emissions. In fact, “None of the G-20 (emissions targets) is in line with the Paris Agreement.”
Furthermore, even if the G-20 nations had achieved their stated goals for CO2 reductions, “it wouldn’t come close to preventing ‘catastrophic warming. – 2 degree Celsius.
None of the EU countries, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, or Turkey is tracking toward its 2030 target. In fact, some nations are seeing rising CO2 levels despite the Paris Agreement.
The IBD rightly points out that climate alarmists base their bad science on “100-year forecasts made by computer models that have trouble predicting what’s already happened.”
Add in the rare admission by Ralph Keeling, co-author of a study on ocean heat uptake, that his team had made a math error. It turned out that the oceans had not absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought. Oops.
Nic Lewis, an independent scientist, makes a habit of reviewing climate alarmist literature. He blogged on climate scientist Judith Curry’s website:
“Just a few hours of analysis and calculations, based only on published information, was sufficient to uncover apparently serious (but surely inadvertent) errors in the underlying calculations.”
No discussion about weather modification or climate change is complete without tossing in the HAARP variable. Even though this top-secret government high-atmospheric heating program was allegedly shut down in 2014, many analysts wonder if intense microwave bursts from huge antenna arrays are behind all manner of meteorological happenings going on around us.
The truth is that the Paris Climate Accord and all the other climate change flap are all part of the United Nation’s Agenda 2030, a blueprint for totalitarian control.
Thank you, President Trump, for withdrawing the U.S. from the deceitful globalists’ plan to force their New World Order down our throats.